Students ChatGPT Prompts
Study smarter, not harder. Essay outlines, research helpers, and complex topic explainers.
Essay Outline on Climate Change
Create a detailed essay outline on Climate Change for a {word_count} {essay_type} at {academic_level}. Start with a thesis that makes a contestable claim — if no informed person could disagree with it, it is a topic statement, not a thesis. Narrow the topic hard — 'climate change' is not an essay, 'the equity problem in carbon pricing' is. Separate scientific consensus from policy disagreement, and cite primary assessment reports rather than news coverage of them. Structure: an introduction that establishes stakes and ends on the thesis; body sections each with one claim, the evidence that supports it, and the analysis connecting evidence to claim; a genuine counter-argument section that states the strongest opposing case rather than a weak version of it, and answers it; and a conclusion that extends rather than repeats. For each body section give the topic sentence, 2-3 evidence types to find, and the transition. Add the five sources to seek and the two most likely weaknesses a marker will attack.
Essay Outline on AI Ethics
Create a detailed essay outline on AI Ethics for a {word_count} {essay_type} at {academic_level}. Start with a thesis that makes a contestable claim — if no informed person could disagree with it, it is a topic statement, not a thesis. Pick one tension and hold it: algorithmic bias, labour displacement, accountability for autonomous decisions, or consent in training data. Avoid speculative far-future framing where current, documented harms make the stronger case. Structure: an introduction that establishes stakes and ends on the thesis; body sections each with one claim, the evidence that supports it, and the analysis connecting evidence to claim; a genuine counter-argument section that states the strongest opposing case rather than a weak version of it, and answers it; and a conclusion that extends rather than repeats. For each body section give the topic sentence, 2-3 evidence types to find, and the transition. Add the five sources to seek and the two most likely weaknesses a marker will attack.
Essay Outline on the Impact of Social Media
Create a detailed essay outline on the Impact of Social Media for a {word_count} {essay_type} at {academic_level}. Start with a thesis that makes a contestable claim — if no informed person could disagree with it, it is a topic statement, not a thesis. Be rigorous about correlation versus causation — most popular claims here outrun the evidence. Specify population and platform rather than generalising, and engage with studies that found null or mixed results. Structure: an introduction that establishes stakes and ends on the thesis; body sections each with one claim, the evidence that supports it, and the analysis connecting evidence to claim; a genuine counter-argument section that states the strongest opposing case rather than a weak version of it, and answers it; and a conclusion that extends rather than repeats. For each body section give the topic sentence, 2-3 evidence types to find, and the transition. Add the five sources to seek and the two most likely weaknesses a marker will attack.
Essay Outline on Education Reform
Create a detailed essay outline on Education Reform for a {word_count} {essay_type} at {academic_level}. Start with a thesis that makes a contestable claim — if no informed person could disagree with it, it is a topic statement, not a thesis. Ground it in a specific system and policy rather than reform in the abstract. Address implementation cost and the interests of teachers, families and administrators, which is where most reform arguments are weakest. Structure: an introduction that establishes stakes and ends on the thesis; body sections each with one claim, the evidence that supports it, and the analysis connecting evidence to claim; a genuine counter-argument section that states the strongest opposing case rather than a weak version of it, and answers it; and a conclusion that extends rather than repeats. For each body section give the topic sentence, 2-3 evidence types to find, and the transition. Add the five sources to seek and the two most likely weaknesses a marker will attack.
Essay Outline on Mental Health
Create a detailed essay outline on Mental Health for a {word_count} {essay_type} at {academic_level}. Start with a thesis that makes a contestable claim — if no informed person could disagree with it, it is a topic statement, not a thesis. Use person-first, non-stigmatising language and stay at the level of policy, access or evidence rather than offering clinical guidance. Distinguish prevalence changes from changes in diagnosis and reporting. Structure: an introduction that establishes stakes and ends on the thesis; body sections each with one claim, the evidence that supports it, and the analysis connecting evidence to claim; a genuine counter-argument section that states the strongest opposing case rather than a weak version of it, and answers it; and a conclusion that extends rather than repeats. For each body section give the topic sentence, 2-3 evidence types to find, and the transition. Add the five sources to seek and the two most likely weaknesses a marker will attack.
Research Paper Structure for Psychology
Structure a research paper in Psychology on {topic} for {target_length}. Cover: a title that states the finding, an abstract following the question-method-result-implication pattern in under 250 words, an introduction moving from field context to the specific gap to the research question, a literature review organised thematically rather than chronologically, methodology detailed enough for replication, results reported without interpretation, a discussion that interprets and situates them, limitations stated honestly, and a conclusion. Use APA structure. Report effect sizes and confidence intervals alongside p-values, preregistration status if applicable, and be explicit about sample characteristics and generalisability — WEIRD-sample limitations belong in the discussion, not buried. For each section give the purpose, target length as a share of the whole, and the two mistakes most often made there. Add the citation style conventions and a section on which claims require a citation and which do not.
Research Paper Structure for Economics
Structure a research paper in Economics on {topic} for {target_length}. Cover: a title that states the finding, an abstract following the question-method-result-implication pattern in under 250 words, an introduction moving from field context to the specific gap to the research question, a literature review organised thematically rather than chronologically, methodology detailed enough for replication, results reported without interpretation, a discussion that interprets and situates them, limitations stated honestly, and a conclusion. Be explicit about the identification strategy: what provides exogenous variation, and what would have to be true for the estimate to be causal. Include robustness checks and state the assumptions the result is most sensitive to. For each section give the purpose, target length as a share of the whole, and the two mistakes most often made there. Add the citation style conventions and a section on which claims require a citation and which do not.
Research Paper Structure for Computer Science
Structure a research paper in Computer Science on {topic} for {target_length}. Cover: a title that states the finding, an abstract following the question-method-result-implication pattern in under 250 words, an introduction moving from field context to the specific gap to the research question, a literature review organised thematically rather than chronologically, methodology detailed enough for replication, results reported without interpretation, a discussion that interprets and situates them, limitations stated honestly, and a conclusion. Lead with the contribution claim, and make evaluation reproducible: datasets, hyperparameters, hardware, and baselines chosen fairly rather than as straw men. Include ablations isolating which component actually produces the gain. For each section give the purpose, target length as a share of the whole, and the two mistakes most often made there. Add the citation style conventions and a section on which claims require a citation and which do not.
Research Paper Structure for Biology
Structure a research paper in Biology on {topic} for {target_length}. Cover: a title that states the finding, an abstract following the question-method-result-implication pattern in under 250 words, an introduction moving from field context to the specific gap to the research question, a literature review organised thematically rather than chronologically, methodology detailed enough for replication, results reported without interpretation, a discussion that interprets and situates them, limitations stated honestly, and a conclusion. Use IMRaD. Report sample sizes, controls, replication and statistical tests per experiment, and distinguish technical from biological replicates. State ethical approvals where organisms or human tissue are involved. For each section give the purpose, target length as a share of the whole, and the two mistakes most often made there. Add the citation style conventions and a section on which claims require a citation and which do not.
Research Paper Structure for History
Structure a research paper in History on {topic} for {target_length}. Cover: a title that states the finding, an abstract following the question-method-result-implication pattern in under 250 words, an introduction moving from field context to the specific gap to the research question, a literature review organised thematically rather than chronologically, methodology detailed enough for replication, results reported without interpretation, a discussion that interprets and situates them, limitations stated honestly, and a conclusion. Distinguish primary from secondary sources throughout and interrogate provenance and bias in both. Situate the argument in the existing historiography, and be careful about reading present-day categories back into the period. For each section give the purpose, target length as a share of the whole, and the two mistakes most often made there. Add the citation style conventions and a section on which claims require a citation and which do not.
Study Guide for Psychology
Create a study guide for Psychology covering {topics} for a {exam_format} exam in {timeframe}. Organise by concept rather than by lecture order, since exams test connections. For each concept give: a plain-language explanation, the precise definition expected, a worked example, the common misconception, and how it typically appears in questions. Heavy on named theories, studies and their critiques. Build a table of study-name, finding, method and limitation, since exams reward knowing what a study did not show as much as what it did. Build in active recall and spaced repetition rather than re-reading: supply 20 self-test questions with answers, and a schedule spreading review across the available time with deliberate revisit points. Add a one-page condensed summary for the final day, and mark the three highest-yield topics against the two that are commonly over-studied for the marks available.
Study Guide for Economics
Create a study guide for Economics covering {topics} for a {exam_format} exam in {timeframe}. Organise by concept rather than by lecture order, since exams test connections. For each concept give: a plain-language explanation, the precise definition expected, a worked example, the common misconception, and how it typically appears in questions. Balance graphical intuition with algebra — most marks are lost on failing to explain what a shift means, not on the maths. Build a bank of diagrams you can reproduce from memory with the shift logic attached. Build in active recall and spaced repetition rather than re-reading: supply 20 self-test questions with answers, and a schedule spreading review across the available time with deliberate revisit points. Add a one-page condensed summary for the final day, and mark the three highest-yield topics against the two that are commonly over-studied for the marks available.
Study Guide for Computer Science
Create a study guide for Computer Science covering {topics} for a {exam_format} exam in {timeframe}. Organise by concept rather than by lecture order, since exams test connections. For each concept give: a plain-language explanation, the precise definition expected, a worked example, the common misconception, and how it typically appears in questions. Prioritise doing over reading: implement the data structures and algorithms rather than memorising their complexities, and build a complexity table you derive rather than recall. Build in active recall and spaced repetition rather than re-reading: supply 20 self-test questions with answers, and a schedule spreading review across the available time with deliberate revisit points. Add a one-page condensed summary for the final day, and mark the three highest-yield topics against the two that are commonly over-studied for the marks available.
Study Guide for Biology
Create a study guide for Biology covering {topics} for a {exam_format} exam in {timeframe}. Organise by concept rather than by lecture order, since exams test connections. For each concept give: a plain-language explanation, the precise definition expected, a worked example, the common misconception, and how it typically appears in questions. Structure around processes and their regulation rather than isolated facts. Draw each pathway from memory and annotate what happens when a step fails, which is how application questions are framed. Build in active recall and spaced repetition rather than re-reading: supply 20 self-test questions with answers, and a schedule spreading review across the available time with deliberate revisit points. Add a one-page condensed summary for the final day, and mark the three highest-yield topics against the two that are commonly over-studied for the marks available.
Study Guide for History
Create a study guide for History covering {topics} for a {exam_format} exam in {timeframe}. Organise by concept rather than by lecture order, since exams test connections. For each concept give: a plain-language explanation, the precise definition expected, a worked example, the common misconception, and how it typically appears in questions. Build chronologies plus thematic threads that cut across them, and for each event hold cause, consequence and historiographical debate. Marks come from argument and evidence, not date recall. Build in active recall and spaced repetition rather than re-reading: supply 20 self-test questions with answers, and a schedule spreading review across the available time with deliberate revisit points. Add a one-page condensed summary for the final day, and mark the three highest-yield topics against the two that are commonly over-studied for the marks available.
Literary Analysis of To Kill a Mockingbird
Write a literary analysis of To Kill a Mockingbird focusing on {focus_area} for {academic_level}. Build an arguable thesis about how the text achieves its effect, not a summary of what happens. Treat these themes as available ground: moral education, racial injustice, the limits of individual virtue against structural racism. Interrogate the narrative frame — the retrospective child narrator both reveals and limits. Engage with the substantial criticism of the white-saviour structure and Tom Robinson's limited interiority rather than treating the novel as straightforwardly moral. Support every claim with close reading of specific passages — quote briefly, then analyse the language itself rather than paraphrasing the content. Address narrative technique, structure, and the historical and publication context where it changes interpretation. Include at least one credible counter-reading and engage with it seriously. Provide the essay outline with topic sentences, the key passages to quote with page-level guidance, critical perspectives worth citing, and the reading most likely to be considered lazy by a marker.
Literary Analysis of 1984
Write a literary analysis of 1984 focusing on {focus_area} for {academic_level}. Build an arguable thesis about how the text achieves its effect, not a summary of what happens. Treat these themes as available ground: surveillance, language as control, the manufacture of truth, atomisation. Treat Newspeak and the appendix as arguments about language and thought rather than background detail. Resist reducing the novel to whichever contemporary politics the reader already holds — the text is more specific than its slogans. Support every claim with close reading of specific passages — quote briefly, then analyse the language itself rather than paraphrasing the content. Address narrative technique, structure, and the historical and publication context where it changes interpretation. Include at least one credible counter-reading and engage with it seriously. Provide the essay outline with topic sentences, the key passages to quote with page-level guidance, critical perspectives worth citing, and the reading most likely to be considered lazy by a marker.
Literary Analysis of The Great Gatsby
Write a literary analysis of The Great Gatsby focusing on {focus_area} for {academic_level}. Build an arguable thesis about how the text achieves its effect, not a summary of what happens. Treat these themes as available ground: the American Dream, class and mobility, reinvention, the unreliability of nostalgia. Focus on Nick as an unreliable and self-exculpating narrator; his judgements are part of the subject. Attend to class distinctions between old and new money, which the green-light reading often flattens. Support every claim with close reading of specific passages — quote briefly, then analyse the language itself rather than paraphrasing the content. Address narrative technique, structure, and the historical and publication context where it changes interpretation. Include at least one credible counter-reading and engage with it seriously. Provide the essay outline with topic sentences, the key passages to quote with page-level guidance, critical perspectives worth citing, and the reading most likely to be considered lazy by a marker.
Literary Analysis of Hamlet
Write a literary analysis of Hamlet focusing on {focus_area} for {academic_level}. Build an arguable thesis about how the text achieves its effect, not a summary of what happens. Treat these themes as available ground: revenge and delay, performance and authenticity, mortality, political legitimacy. Engage with the textual variants across Q1, Q2 and F, since 'the text' is itself a critical question. Treat delay as a structural and theatrical problem rather than only a psychological one. Support every claim with close reading of specific passages — quote briefly, then analyse the language itself rather than paraphrasing the content. Address narrative technique, structure, and the historical and publication context where it changes interpretation. Include at least one credible counter-reading and engage with it seriously. Provide the essay outline with topic sentences, the key passages to quote with page-level guidance, critical perspectives worth citing, and the reading most likely to be considered lazy by a marker.
Literary Analysis of Pride and Prejudice
Write a literary analysis of Pride and Prejudice focusing on {focus_area} for {academic_level}. Build an arguable thesis about how the text achieves its effect, not a summary of what happens. Treat these themes as available ground: marriage as economics, first impressions and revision, class, irony as moral instrument. Attend to free indirect discourse — the technique is the argument, blurring narrator and Elizabeth's judgement so the reader shares her errors. Ground the marriage plot in the real economics of entailment and female dependency. Support every claim with close reading of specific passages — quote briefly, then analyse the language itself rather than paraphrasing the content. Address narrative technique, structure, and the historical and publication context where it changes interpretation. Include at least one credible counter-reading and engage with it seriously. Provide the essay outline with topic sentences, the key passages to quote with page-level guidance, critical perspectives worth citing, and the reading most likely to be considered lazy by a marker.
Lab Report for a Chemical Reaction Experiment
Write a lab report for a Chemical Reaction Experiment on {experiment_topic}. Follow the standard structure: title, abstract, introduction with background and a testable hypothesis, materials and methods written in enough detail to replicate exactly, results presented in tables and figures with captions that stand alone, discussion interpreting the results against the hypothesis, and conclusion. Report theoretical versus actual yield with percentage yield, and account for the loss rather than only noting it. Include balanced equations, reagent purity and stoichiometric calculations, plus the hazard assessment. Keep interpretation out of the results section entirely — that is the single most common mark deduction. In the discussion, address sources of error specifically rather than listing generic ones, say which most likely affected the outcome and in which direction, and state what you would change. Add the figure and table conventions, and the citation format expected.
Lab Report for a Physics Experiment
Write a lab report for a Physics Experiment on {experiment_topic}. Follow the standard structure: title, abstract, introduction with background and a testable hypothesis, materials and methods written in enough detail to replicate exactly, results presented in tables and figures with captions that stand alone, discussion interpreting the results against the hypothesis, and conclusion. Uncertainty analysis is the substance of the report: propagate errors through every calculation, distinguish systematic from random error, and compare the result to the accepted value in terms of uncertainty rather than raw difference. Keep interpretation out of the results section entirely — that is the single most common mark deduction. In the discussion, address sources of error specifically rather than listing generic ones, say which most likely affected the outcome and in which direction, and state what you would change. Add the figure and table conventions, and the citation format expected.
Lab Report for a Biology Dissection
Write a lab report for a Biology Dissection on {experiment_topic}. Follow the standard structure: title, abstract, introduction with background and a testable hypothesis, materials and methods written in enough detail to replicate exactly, results presented in tables and figures with captions that stand alone, discussion interpreting the results against the hypothesis, and conclusion. Structure around structure-to-function relationships with labelled anatomical drawings. State the ethical framework and specimen sourcing, and use correct anatomical terminology and orientation throughout. Keep interpretation out of the results section entirely — that is the single most common mark deduction. In the discussion, address sources of error specifically rather than listing generic ones, say which most likely affected the outcome and in which direction, and state what you would change. Add the figure and table conventions, and the citation format expected.
Lab Report for a Psychology Experiment
Write a lab report for a Psychology Experiment on {experiment_topic}. Follow the standard structure: title, abstract, introduction with background and a testable hypothesis, materials and methods written in enough detail to replicate exactly, results presented in tables and figures with captions that stand alone, discussion interpreting the results against the hypothesis, and conclusion. Use APA format. Report participant demographics, the sampling method and its limits, ethical approval and informed consent, and the statistical test with effect size and confidence interval alongside significance. Keep interpretation out of the results section entirely — that is the single most common mark deduction. In the discussion, address sources of error specifically rather than listing generic ones, say which most likely affected the outcome and in which direction, and state what you would change. Add the figure and table conventions, and the citation format expected.
Lab Report for an Environmental Science Field Study
Write a lab report for an Environmental Science Field Study on {experiment_topic}. Follow the standard structure: title, abstract, introduction with background and a testable hypothesis, materials and methods written in enough detail to replicate exactly, results presented in tables and figures with captions that stand alone, discussion interpreting the results against the hypothesis, and conclusion. Detail the sampling design — sites, replication, timing — and the confounds fieldwork cannot control. Include calibration of instruments and chain of custody for samples where analysis is off-site. Keep interpretation out of the results section entirely — that is the single most common mark deduction. In the discussion, address sources of error specifically rather than listing generic ones, say which most likely affected the outcome and in which direction, and state what you would change. Add the figure and table conventions, and the citation format expected.
Thesis Statement Development
Develop thesis statements for an essay on {topic} at {academic_level} for a {essay_type}. Produce five candidates taking genuinely different positions, not rewordings of one. Each must be contestable — if no informed reader could disagree, it is a topic statement — specific enough to be arguable in the available word count, and must signal the line of reasoning rather than only the conclusion. For each, state the position, the evidence required to sustain it, the strongest counter-argument, and whether the scope fits the word limit. Then diagnose: mark any that are merely descriptive, too broad to defend, or that smuggle in an assumption. Recommend the strongest with a short explanation, and show one weak-to-strong revision so the reasoning is visible.
Flashcard Set for Exam Prep
Create a flashcard set for {subject} covering {topics} for a {exam_type}. Follow the rules that make cards actually work: one fact per card, questions that demand retrieval rather than recognition, and no card answerable by pattern-matching the phrasing. Avoid simply splitting a definition across two sides. Produce 40 cards across three types — recall, application, and compare-and-contrast — and mark each with its type. For concepts that are easily confused, write cards that force the distinction explicitly. Add a spaced-repetition schedule across the available time, guidance on handling cards you keep failing (rewrite rather than repeat), and the topics for which flashcards are the wrong tool and worked problems are needed instead.
Annotated Bibliography
Create an annotated bibliography on {topic} for {academic_level} in {citation_style}. For each of 10 sources give: the full citation, a concise summary of the argument and method, an evaluation of credibility covering author expertise, publication venue, date and any conflict of interest, and — most importantly — a statement of how it relates to your own argument and to the other sources. Include disagreement: a bibliography where every source agrees suggests inadequate searching. Distinguish primary from secondary sources, and flag any that are popular rather than scholarly along with whether that is acceptable here. Add the search strategy used (databases, terms, date range) and the gap in the literature the set reveals.
Presentation Script and Slides
Build a {duration} presentation on {topic} for {audience}. Work backwards from the one thing the audience should remember. Produce a slide-by-slide plan where each slide has a headline stated as a full assertion rather than a label, one supporting visual, and the words the speaker actually says. Keep body text under 20 words per slide — the slide is not the script. Cover the opening that earns attention in the first 30 seconds, signposting so the audience always knows where they are, and a close that lands the single message rather than trailing off into questions. Add speaker notes with timing per section, the three questions most likely to be asked with answers, and what to cut first if the slot is shortened.
Critical Thinking Essay Framework
Build a framework for writing a critical analysis essay on {topic} at {academic_level}. Establish the difference between description and critique up front, since conflating them is the most common failure: description says what a source claims, critique evaluates whether the claim is warranted. Provide a structure for interrogating an argument — identify the conclusion, the stated premises, the unstated assumptions, the evidence type and its quality, and the inferential gaps. Include a checklist of common fallacies with how each looks in academic prose specifically. Then give the essay structure that presents this analysis as an argument of your own rather than a list of objections, guidance on engaging with the strongest version of an opposing view, and how to signal appropriate uncertainty without hedging into vagueness.